Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What do you expect to accomplish by lecturing a vendor who has shown
very good faith over the years in supporting FreeBSD? Maybe we should
tell Intel to piss off since you obviously know how to support their
hardware much better than they do.
We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals
on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor
and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware.
Are you implying that Jack has no merit? That's an unfortunate
assertion. What evidence do you have to support that?
We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested before
being committed, especially to -STABLE.
I guess you missed that part where Jack said that the changes had
undergone extensive testing.
Scott
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
