In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Leidinger writes: >> As has been discussed in various forums recently, this OpenBSD sensors >> stuff has been proceeding with little developer buy-in or discussion, > >Wait please. It was on the ides list before the soc and during the soc. >There where links to an overview and to source files. And several >committers voted in the Google soc interface for this framework (else >another project would have been chosen instead). >[...] >I may be wrong, but I think Poul was also one of the people with voting >rights and as far as I remember I didn't voted against the sensors >framework (can probably be checked in the google webinterface for the >soc).
Just because something is a good SoC project doesn't mean that it should end up in -current. SoC has en entirely different profile, and my vote or non-vote in one, is no reflection on my opinion on the other. >> and the developer input that has happened has largely been ignored. So > >Sorry, but this is not true. Poul objected before, yes. We started to >talk with him, and then he stopped talking with us. You never have, and still do not, address the central objection I have to this stuff: it's basic premise. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
