On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:42:36PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > The original idea was to stick to a single BSD license for > libraries/base, and I think that's what we should do. > > What do we need to do to make this happen?
You need to get each contributor of modules not already under the GHC Licence to agree to it for their modules. The H98 and FFI licences look the most different. > I must admit this is one of the areas of licensing that I'm most > confused about. Should the single BSD license list *all* the copyright > holders, or is it ok to list just one (say the University of Glasgow)? Maybe you could just say "and others, as detailed in the source files". _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
