Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > But I'm pretty sure we don't need a disclaimer listing lots of names. > We're not trying to follow lots of variant BSD licences; we're asking > people to agree to release their code under a single > licence.
Single license, but still multiple copyright holders. > For the > base package, this has to be the GHC licence, because that would be too > hard to change. The licence includes a non-endorsement clause and a > disclaimer mentioning "the University and the contributors", and surely > everyone can agree to that. True, I overlooked "and the contributors". That should be sufficient, I hope. Manuel _______________________________________________ Cvs-libraries mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-libraries
