Simon Marlow wrote:
But wait - the default is *already* for the type/class constructor to be
picked instead of the data constructor.  Now I'm confused!  Could you
give me an example?

*ahem* It was a typo in my first mail regarding this problem. And no matter what the default is, it is wrong sometimes. But your :Blah proposal for data constructors looks OK. Just to be clear: The ':' should be required only when Haddock can't see constructor.

Apart from that, the hyperlinks have vastly improved with the recent
Haddock commits. Thanks!

Cheers,
   S.


_______________________________________________ Cvs-fptools mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools

Reply via email to