Simon Marlow wrote:
No - the ':' would be required when Haddock can see both the type
constructor and the data constructor, and you want to force it to link
to the data constructor. Otherwise the default is to link to the type
constructor.
OK, ':' would then be required when either both kinds of constructors
are in scope (e.g. data Foo = Foo) or none of them is (e.g. in a comment
which refers to a constructor in a different module).
Cheers,
S.
_______________________________________________
Cvs-fptools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools
