> *ahem* It was a typo in my first mail regarding this problem.
> And no matter
> what the default is, it is wrong sometimes. But your :Blah
> proposal for
> data constructors looks OK. Just to be clear: The ':' should
> be required
> only when Haddock can't see constructor.
No - the ':' would be required when Haddock can see both the type
constructor and the data constructor, and you want to force it to link
to the data constructor. Otherwise the default is to link to the type
constructor.
> Apart from that, the hyperlinks have vastly improved with the recent
> Haddock commits. Thanks!
Glad to hear it :)
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-fptools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools
