Hi
I have some misgivings about whether linking LGPL Haskell libraries is
within the spirit of the license, given that re-linking is often
impractical. But nobody else seems to care about this, I haven't seen any
authors of Haskell LGPL libraries complain that users can't easily comply
with it. I suppose the re-linking requirement isn't as critical as the
contribute-changes-back requirements, so authors are prepared to turn a
blind eye.
Malcolm, how do you feel about this? Are we able to link cpphs as a
library statically to GHC?
Malcolm is away on holiday for the next 2 weeks, so you'll have to wait a while.
Thanks
Neil
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
