Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> given that (if I have understood correctly) the
technical context here is using GHC in conjunction with a Microsoft C
compiler as a backend
Slight correction - we're not using the MS C compiler as a backend. We'll
be using the MS linker and a free assembler. GHC will also be able to
invoke the MS C compiler for compiling C code.
But nobody else seems to care about this, I haven't seen any
authors of Haskell LGPL libraries complain that users can't easily comply
with it. I suppose the re-linking requirement isn't as critical
Many Haskell LGPL libraries already employ the same static-linking
exception that wxWidgets pioneered.
That's handy to know, thanks.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
