On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:59:35PM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote: > I'm still on holiday, but saw this and thought I'd join in. > > > Malcolm, how do you feel about this? Are we able to link cpphs as a > > library statically to GHC? > > However I'm honestly not sure whether > library or binary is the better policy in this case.
I'm not sure either. You gave good reasons for prefering binaries; the main advantage I see for a library is that we will get the same behaviour on all platforms. > Without wanting to start (another) licensing war, it is worth noting > that the (L)GPL is one of the most widely used and understood software > licences in the world. I would say the (L)GPL is one of the most widely used and *mis*understood software licences in the world. I believe a large proportion, perhaps even the majority, of people using it believe you can't sell GPLed software, for example. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
