Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
On 04/08/2008, at 20:50, Claus Reinke wrote:
0. for each platform, have a list of successfully tested patches
1. push patches as now
2. humans pull the lists of tested patches, then only pull
the patches on the list for their platform (unless they
are trying to debug the failed patches) - this could be
handled by a script like darcs-all
3. builders pull all patches, try to build
4. whenever a builder succeeds, it adds all its patches to
the list for its platform
I think it is important that everyone has the same source tree and that
darcs-all pull gets the same patches for everyone and my gut feeling is
that breaking this will result in chaos.
In particular, it is crucial to pull all changes before pushing (to spot
conflicts).
Definitely. Also, we're about to switch VCSs, so anything that relies on a
feature unique to darcs isn't an option.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
