Hi Ian, Is the list of which 215 packages failed available somewhere? It would be nice to know if any of my packages were on it.
Thanks, Neil On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > We now have an automated program for performing regression tests against > all of hackage: > > darcs get http://darcs.haskell.org/hackage-test/ > > > > An example of how to use it: > > > Here's a run with the HEAD, no special options: > > $ ht normal ../cabal-install/dist/build/cabal/cabal \ > /home/ian/ghc/darcs/ghc/inst/bin/ghc \ > /home/ian/ghc/darcs/ghc/inst/bin/ghc-pkg \ > "" "" > [7.75 hours pass] > > Then another run, this time using -XAlternativeLayoutRule to compile > each package (but not the build dependencies of the package): > > $ ht alternative ../cabal-install/dist/build/cabal/cabal \ > /home/ian/ghc/darcs/ghc/inst/bin/ghc \ > /home/ian/ghc/darcs/ghc/inst/bin/ghc-pkg \ > "" \ > "--ghc-option=-XAlternativeLayoutRule" > [7 hours pass] > > And finally a comparison of the results: > > $ htc normal alternative > normal > Buildable Build failed Deps failed Not tried > alternative Buildable 628 0 0 0 > Build failed 73 215 0 0 > Deps failed 0 0 170 0 > Not tried 0 0 0 0 > > i.e. 73 packages became unbuildable when the alternative layout rule was > used. > > > > Thanks > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > Cvs-ghc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc > _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
