Looks good. Ian would you be OK with including this patch with 7.4? (see email below).
Cheers, David. On 30 January 2012 17:10, Ben Gamari <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:21:37 -0500, Ben Gamari <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yesterday I finally had a large block of time to devote to the ARM >> linker. While I spent a large fraction of the day tracking down an >> unrelated bug (ticket #5824, David, your feedback would be greatly >> appreciated here), the linker is looking quite good, >> > [snip] > > I've cleaned up the patch and found the last lingering bug (that I know > of) and it seems things still work. I've pushed the cleaned up tree > (my entire history sans debugging code squished into one tidy patch) to > my arm-ghci-7.4-clean branch of my Github repository > (https://github.com/bgamari/ghc/tree/arm-ghci-7.4-clean). > > At this point, the patch is, in my opinion, merge-ready if there are no > objections. The changes are quite self-contained with nearly all of the > changes being #ifdef'd by HOST_ARCH in Linker.c so the threat of > regression in already working code should be negligible. Is it possible > that this, along with the patches in #5824 (also quite self-contained), > could make it in to 7.4? It would be nice to be able to claim full ARM > support in this release. > > Cheers, > > - Ben _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
