you can't do that. george bush is "the decider". scott
Robert Citek wrote: > Hello all, > > What voting system would be appropriate for a group of people to set > priorities on a set of tasks? > > Let's imagine you work on an Open Source project with five other people: > Pat, Chris, Kelly, Terry, and Lee. The project you are working on has > lots know bugs of various degrees of severity in its bug-tracking > system. Your task as a group is to decide which bug to tackle first, > then second, then third, etc. In short, rank the bugs by severity. > > What kind of voting system would you use to determine rank? Does anyone > know how the larger OS projects handle this? > > One system that came to mind would be for the members of the group to > vote one of them as "the decider" and have that person set the priorities. > > Regards, > - Robert > > _______________________________________________ > CWE-LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cwelug.org/ > http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ > http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/ -- R. Scott Granneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ www.granneman.com Full list of publications @ http://www.granneman.com/publications My new book: Linux Phrasebook @ http://www.granneman.com/books Read the Download Squad Blog @ http://www.downloadsquad.com "... the Declaration of Independence, a masterpiece of ambiguous idealism, was followed by the Constitution, a masterpiece of ambiguous practicality." ---Howard Zinn, Declarations of Independence _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
