I believe that assigning issue managers would help, a project and they should be the ones to rank it. However they see fit for the overall successful production of the project, they being developers as well.
I would think that security-related bugs would be first priority in rank then other bugs follow in rank. > One system that came to mind would be for the members of the group to > vote one of them as "the decider" and have that person set the priorities. One person could be the issue manager even two of the five. On 2/14/07, A.M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:25 , Robert Citek wrote: > > > Scott Granneman wrote: > >> does Trac allow for voting? > > > > Dunno. I would imagine that even if one was able to group bugs into > > different severity categories, there still needs to be a method of > > ranking them. For example, let's say you have 20 bugs in the same > > category and you have 5 people at your disposal to work on them, which > > ones do you do first? Who decides that? > > Trac has a poll plugin: > http://www.trac-hacks.org/wiki/PollMacro > > But I doubt that it will help. It's likely that every person will set > different priorities anyway. I often see that user-driven open-source > projects thrive beyond the "this is cool" stage. Perhaps you should > ask the users what they would like to see. > > Cheers, > M > > _______________________________________________ > CWE-LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.cwelug.org/ > http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ > http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/ > -- ================================= knot in cables caused data stream to become twisted and kinked. http://groups.google.com/group/lispstl http://www.cwelug.org/ Patrick Pippen _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
