Can I just check: are we talking about OASIS WS-RM, OASIS WS-RX, WS-Reliability or WS-Reliable Messaging (WS-RM)?
Mark. -----Original Message----- From: Glynn, Eoghan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/17/2007 4:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: WS-RM interop Hi Guillaume, This is definitely something we need to do, especially in the light of the recent extended discussion about partial responses, and the minor modifications identified to allow for wider interop (tolerance to Systinet partial response with response code 200, usage of null content-type to indicate an empty HTTP entity-body etc...). I'm going to capture these mods in a JIRA issue. We'll probably need to close that off first, then look at doing the actual interop testing. Cheers, Eoghan > -----Original Message----- > From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 January 2007 17:51 > To: [email protected] > Subject: WS-RM interop > > Has anyone tried CXF WS-RM implementation interoperability > with other existing implementations ? .Net, Axis2, etc ... > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/) > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >
