> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 17 January 2007 10:46 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: WS-RM interop > > Can I just check: are we talking about OASIS WS-RM, OASIS > WS-RX, WS-Reliability or WS-Reliable Messaging (WS-RM)?
Well we're not yet taking about OASIS WS-RX (AKA WS-RM 1.1). We'll look at supporting this once the new spec is finalized. Neither are we talking about the rival WS-Reliability spec, backed by the Sun/Fujitsu/Hitachi/Oracle/NEC/Sonic camp. And I guess OASIS WS-RM is really just the 1.1 version of this. We never planned support for either version. What we are talking about currently is the WS-ReliableMessaging 1.0 spec [1], as backed by the BEA/IBM/MicroSoft/TIBCO camp. Cheers, Eoghan [1] ftp://www6.software.ibm.com/software/developer/library/ws-reliablemessag ing200502.pdf > Mark. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glynn, Eoghan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 1/17/2007 4:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: WS-RM interop > > > > Hi Guillaume, > > This is definitely something we need to do, especially in the > light of the recent extended discussion about partial > responses, and the minor modifications identified to allow > for wider interop (tolerance to Systinet partial response > with response code 200, usage of null content-type to > indicate an empty HTTP entity-body etc...). > > I'm going to capture these mods in a JIRA issue. We'll > probably need to close that off first, then look at doing the > actual interop testing. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 16 January 2007 17:51 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: WS-RM interop > > > > Has anyone tried CXF WS-RM implementation interoperability > with other > > existing implementations ? .Net, Axis2, etc ... > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/) > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > >
