I know, I was heavily involved ;-) Unfortunately interoperability got
more space in the specifications than in reality during the formative
years :-(
Mark.
On 22 Jan 2007, at 01:32, Ted Neward wrote:
Hey, at least in those days, there was only ONE spec group to
follow (the
OMG), instead of the three or four we've got now....
Ted Neward
Java, .NET, XML Services
Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
http://www.tedneward.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Little [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 1:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WS-RM interop
Yes, let's all go back to CORBA. Life was so much simpler in those
days ;-)
Mark.
On 19 Jan 2007, at 20:09, Oisin Hurley wrote:
Well we're not yet taking about OASIS WS-RX (AKA WS-RM 1.1). We'll
look
at supporting this once the new spec is finalized.
Neither are we talking about the rival WS-Reliability spec,
backed by
the Sun/Fujitsu/Hitachi/Oracle/NEC/Sonic camp. And I guess OASIS
WS-RM
is really just the 1.1 version of this. We never planned support
for
either version.
What we are talking about currently is the WS-ReliableMessaging
1.0 spec
[1], as backed by the BEA/IBM/MicroSoft/TIBCO camp.
Isn't it cool the way web services has made distributed systems and
our lives simpler? (cough)
--oh
;-)
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date:
1/20/2007
10:31 PM
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date:
1/20/2007
10:31 PM
