1: +1 2: I'm in favor (+1) of a TLP. What I've seen of the WS project does not suggest to me that it would be synergistic.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've started some discussions on the cxf-private list about graduation > stuff, but I wanted to bring it out to the wider list. > > OK, question #1: are we ready to graduate? Other than a few > administravia things like updating the status page with the results of > the karma cleanup (which I'll do once I remember how to update that > page... It's been a while.), are there any other issues that people > feel would need to be resolved? > > Question #2: assuming #1 is yes, should we graduate to a top level > project or to a subproject of something else. If subproject, where? > > > > My thoughts: > On #1: yes. We have now have a diverse community of contributors. We > have shown we can do releases based on apache guidelines. (we've done 6 > of them). We have shown we conduct our discussions in public within > full view of the community. We have followed Apache guidelines and > voting proceedures wherever required. I don't feel there is anything > left to gain by remaining in the incubator. > > On #2: I'm strongly in favor of going TLP. While some may argue that a > subproject of ws may be preferred, I'm not one of them. :-) I > personally think the WS project should actually be broken up a bit, so > making the situation worse doesn't accomplish anything. However, > that is mostly my subjective opinion. > > Anyone else have any thoughts? > > -- > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer, IONA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
