Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2008, 12:12 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp: > On #2: I'm strongly in favor of going TLP. While some may argue that a > subproject of ws may be preferred, I'm not one of them. :-) I > personally think the WS project should actually be broken up a bit, so > making the situation worse doesn't accomplish anything. However, > that is mostly my subjective opinion. >
TLP, unless we are interested in rigging up something with ActiveMQ, Camel, and ServiceMix under something like an Apache ESB TLP. Being a subproject under WS would result in conflicting goals IMO. Another benefit of a TLP is that if the JAX-RS stuff spawns off into a separate project a la Metro/Jersey it would also remain part of the same TLP. Glen > Anyone else have any thoughts? >
