+1 for graduation as a top level project. We have different scope and mission, we should be a TLP.
On 2/28/08, Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2008, 12:12 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp: > > > On #2: I'm strongly in favor of going TLP. While some may argue that a > > subproject of ws may be preferred, I'm not one of them. :-) I > > personally think the WS project should actually be broken up a bit, so > > making the situation worse doesn't accomplish anything. However, > > that is mostly my subjective opinion. > > > > TLP, unless we are interested in rigging up something with ActiveMQ, > Camel, and ServiceMix under something like an Apache ESB TLP. Being a > subproject under WS would result in conflicting goals IMO. Another > benefit of a TLP is that if the JAX-RS stuff spawns off into a separate > project a la Metro/Jersey it would also remain part of the same TLP. > > Glen > > > Anyone else have any thoughts? > > > >
