2014-03-20 20:04 GMT+01:00 John McCall <[email protected]>: > On Mar 20, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Hubert Tong <[email protected]> wrote: >> John McCall <[email protected]> wrote on 20-03-2014 01:56:10 PM: >> > From: John McCall <[email protected]> >> > To: Hubert Tong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Date: 20-03-2014 01:56 PM >> > Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Missing mangling of elaborated type specifiers >> > >> > On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Hubert Tong <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > It seems that the ABI is missing mangling for elaborated type specifiers. >> > > >> > > Background: >> > > As mentioned in Core Issue 1162, elaborated-type-specifiers may be >> > used to cause SFINAE. >> > >> > Good point. I guess this should just be added to <unresolved-name>. >> > Would you care to make a proposal? >> > >> >> Sure. > > Great! > > I think I was wrong, by the way; you should add it to to the > <class-enum-type> grammar as a decoration before we enter <name>. >
I'm glad that it doesn't seem to cause too much difficulty to add this. Looks like this will fix the second half of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48920 ? _______________________________________________ cxx-abi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
