On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Hubert Tong <[email protected]> wrote:
> John McCall <[email protected]> wrote on 26-03-2014 03:54:40 PM:
> > From: John McCall <[email protected]>
> > To: Richard Smith <[email protected]>,
> > Cc: Hubert Tong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "[email protected]"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Date: 26-03-2014 03:54 PM
> > Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Missing mangling of elaborated type specifiers
> >
> > On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 26 March 2014 11:59, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree that the benefit of a demangler being able to say whether
> > it's got a class or struct is marginal. Maybe drop the 'TC' mangling
> > and keep the other three?
> >
> > Sounds good to me.
> Agreed. The proposal I had in the works was substantially similar (option 2
> with no class/struct distinction).
> I think we can move forward with the proposal presented by Richard.
Okay, so this is the proposal under review:
<class-enum-type> ::= <name> # non-dependent or dependent type name or
dependent elaborated type specifier using ‘typename'
::= Ts <name> # dependent elaborated type specifier using
‘struct’ or ‘class'
::= Tu <name> # dependent elaborated type specifier using
‘union'
::= Te <name> # dependent elaborated type specifier using
‘enum’
If I hear no objections by the end of next week, I’ll go ahead and commit this.
John.
_______________________________________________
cxx-abi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
