On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:36 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 26 March 2014 13:59, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Hubert Tong <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > John McCall <[email protected]> wrote on 26-03-2014 03:54:40 PM:
>> > > From: John McCall <[email protected]>
>> > > To: Richard Smith <[email protected]>,
>> > > Cc: Hubert Tong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "[email protected]"
>> > > <[email protected]>
>> > > Date: 26-03-2014 03:54 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Missing mangling of elaborated type specifiers
>> > >
>> > > On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > On 26 March 2014 11:59, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > I agree that the benefit of a demangler being able to say whether
>> > > it's got a class or struct is marginal. Maybe drop the 'TC' mangling
>> > > and keep the other three?
>> > >
>> > > Sounds good to me.
>> > Agreed. The proposal I had in the works was substantially similar (option
>> > 2 with no class/struct distinction).
>> > I think we can move forward with the proposal presented by Richard.
>>
>> Okay, so this is the proposal under review:
>>
>> <class-enum-type> ::= <name> # non-dependent or dependent type name or
>> dependent elaborated type specifier using ‘typename'
>>
>> Nit: This last case is a typename-specifier, not an
>> elaborated-type-specifier.
>
> I will make that change.
>
>> Do we need to clarify that we mean 'instantiation-dependent' by 'dependent'
>> here?
>
> No, I think that’s the standard rule for dependence in the mangling section.
Okay, I’ve applied and pushed these changes. Thanks!
John.
_______________________________________________
cxx-abi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cxx-abi-dev
