Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: > >>>Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them > >>>for quality... > >Corinna says: > >> > >>Why not? > > > >ummm because I am a busy boy? :P - barely get a few minutes spare at > >all these days, let alone next to my cygwin computer. > > Maybe we need to change the approval process so that people actually have > to try the package before saying "Aye".
I agree, even though in the past I've been one of those who've done this. I can see where the breakdown lies. It seems that since Chuck left for vacation that no one takes on looking at a package. The other method would be to put the package in test mode, announce the test version of the new package, and let the users give their opinion. I think I like this even better. Earnie.
