>On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:14:46PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> >>>Just a pro-vote - for both - not that i have had a chance to check them
> >>>for quality...
> >Corinna says:
> >>
> >>Why not?
> >
> >ummm because I am a busy boy?  :P - barely get a few minutes spare at
> >all these days, let alone next to my cygwin computer.
>
>Maybe we need to change the approval process so that people actually have
>to try the package before saying "Aye".


Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed
a) - someone to check it for packaging.
b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the 
distribution.

which so long as person in a) is competant - seems fine to me.

Gareth


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to