n Wed, 2002-09-11 at 19:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > ...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever > get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always > see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see > always the same (less) names if it comes to reviewing a package.
Insanely busy at the moment. I try to keep up to date, and comment where I have an opinion.... > And by all means I think a positive vote should be combined with at > least *some* reviewing of a package. I think that the two steps are very distinct. Obviously more review is good, but requiring review is not good IMO. > Outstanding packages: > > procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me) I think this is an excellent thing to include. Yes. > ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas) Looks neat. Yes. > doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes) This is quite a popular documentation system. I don't use it myself, but I know folk who do. Also, libxml and libxslt are documented via it, and they are in the distro. Yes. > astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth) I'm still looking for a good C++ prettier. I'll try to check this out in the next week or so. Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
