On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:07:48PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Dean Scarff wrote: > >> > Ok, I've just reviewed the package. Do you mind moving the contents of >> > /usr/doc/nasm to /usr/doc/nasm-0.98.35 ? >> > >> > Btw, please, do not update the cygwin specific part of the package >> > version number when releasing an updated version in the process of >> > reviewing. >> > >> >> My mistake, both the above points are fixed now. The new binary package looks like: > >Should I upload this package ? The missing pdf is not a big deal IMO since >the package provides both info and html docs.
Go for it! cgf
