On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:07:48PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Dean Scarff wrote: > > > >> > Ok, I've just reviewed the package. Do you mind moving the contents of > >> > /usr/doc/nasm to /usr/doc/nasm-0.98.35 ? > >> > > >> > Btw, please, do not update the cygwin specific part of the package > >> > version number when releasing an updated version in the process of > >> > reviewing. > >> > > >> > >> My mistake, both the above points are fixed now. The new binary package looks >like: > > > >Should I upload this package ? The missing pdf is not a big deal IMO since > >the package provides both info and html docs. > > Go for it!
Ok, the package files are uploaded on sourceware. Dean, please, send an announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a couple of hours. You might want to refer to the archive of the cygwin-announce list to see how to format the announcement.
