On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > @ ccdoc > > > > date : 26 Feb 2003 > > version: 0.8.39-1 > > status : reviewed; the package is ok, it is just missing the votes > > votes : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit) > > This sounds interesting; I'm voting for it too.
Your just a moment too late, Igor. I've just uploaded it. ;-) > > @ Aspell > > > > date : 07 Apr 2003 > > version: 0.50.3-1 > > status : not reviewed > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00155.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-04/msg00356.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00239.html > > The last note mentions that it doesn't work. Has this been addressed? > > > @ cygbuild > > > > date : 12 Jun 2003 > > version: 2003.0612-1 > > status : not reviewed > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html > > votes : 0 > > Umm, hasn't this been vetoed? No Chris withdrew his vetoe. > > @ dyndns > > > > date : 18 Jun 2003 > > version: 2003.0618-1 > > status : not reviewed > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00158.html > > votes : 0 > > url : none available > > This is missing the package URLs altogether -- should it be in the list of > packages? URL's weren't provided. I left that there hoping Jari will come and correct me. > > > @ Aspell-en > > > > date : 19 Jun 2003 > > version: 0.51.0-1 > > status : reviewed > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00161.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00229.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00232.html > > votes : 0 (aspell prerequisite) > > At a guess, people who voted for Aspell will have voted for this one, > right? Pretty much. Aspell isn't a very good public speaker without her dict. :-) > > @ stunnel > > > > date : 25 Jun 2003 > > version: 4.04-1 > > status : reviewed > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00207.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00209.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00211.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00227.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00236.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00237.html > > votes : 3 (Abraham, Elfyn and Gerrit) > > Has anyone done a functionality review on this one? I've only seen a > packaging review. In the last note, Max said that he was planning to do > one, but I didn't see a follow-up. I've tested it with my mailgate and it seems fine to me. I'll post my results in a minute. Sorry too much coffee is making me do things backwards. > > @ naim > > > > date : 25 Jun 2003 > > version: (null) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Oops, I missed the version number in the xml file for that. I'll fix that. > > status : not reviewed > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00234.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00280.html > > votes : 2 (Elfyn and Gerrit) > > url : http://shell.n.ml.org/n/naim/naim-0.11.5.9.cyg10-cygwinrelease.tar.bz2 > > The URL above contains all 3 files (the source tarball, the binary > tarball, and setup.hint). The version is a bit weird: 0.11.5.9.cyg10-1. > I'm assuming the ".cyg10" bit will hopefully go away once the package is > actually accepted. As of now, it seems to be propagated throughout (i.e., > the readme, etc). I'll post a separate review message shortly. > > > @ cabextract > > > > date : 27 Jun 2003 > > version: 0.6-1 > > status : not reviewed > > notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00245.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00244.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00251.html > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00255.html > > votes : 2 (Charles and Jason) > > This has my vote. > Igor Elfyn -- Elfyn McBratney, EMCB http://www.emcb.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
