On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
@ cygbuild
date : 12 Jun 2003 version: 2003.0612-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html votes : 0
Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
No Chris withdrew his vetoe.
No, I did not withdraw the veto. I have been vetoing this consistently since before it even showed up in this list.
Yes, I totally agree. I can't understand why the maintainer doesn't just use the script by Chuck? Cygbuild is totally redundant. Why doesn't he merge any improvements in Cygbuild with it? That would make the most sense and allivate even more confusion...
Cheers, Nicholas
