On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:03:12AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
@ cygbuild
date : 12 Jun 2003 version: 2003.0612-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00104.html http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00105.html votes : 0
Umm, hasn't this been vetoed?
Yes.
Right. Sorry. Just the using cygbuild (as apposed to gbs) is allowed.
While technically this is true, I really can't see the difference between the two. For simplicity's sake, using a common script for method II would be most helpful. I'm willing to do the conversion for gc & cabextract.
Cheers, Nicholas
