On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 01:51:24AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 10:43:11PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >"Prefab Program Selections" > > > >? It still has that Unix ugly to it, but it actually says what it means and > >means what it says, so everybody wins. > > I like "selections" but I don't like "prefab". And, right now, I think that > Igor was telling me that you can't do something like: > > Prefab Program Selections > C Development > X Desktop > ... > > Because setup.exe can't handle that. > > So, it would have to be: > > C Development Prefab Program Selection > X Desktop Prefab Program Selection > ... > > which is a little wordy. > > I do think we want to convey that these are optional easy-to-use selections > which will pull in all of the programs required for a standard "use case" > (as they like to say where I work). > > How about "standard selection"? > > C Development Standard Selection > X Desktop Standard Selection > ... > > Bleah. I don't know. Maybe it just can't be properly conveyed without > all sorts of flashy gui balloons and help. >
How about 'Bundle' ? Tim. "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results." -- Winston Churchill
