-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Max Bowsher wrote: > > Speaking of in-use DLLs, did you have a chance to look at > <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-03/msg00060.html>?
OK, I'll have a look. >> So, I think we should always rename preremove scripts, because we >> certainly don't want a failed preremove script to be removed by the >> later file-removal phase - it might be wanted for debugging. > > I would even go one step further, and cancel the uninstall of the current > package and all packages it depends on if the preremove failed. But > that should be a separate patch. > >> As for postinstall scripts ... I think ideally it would be a separate >> operation (c.f. 'dpkg --configure --pending'), but I guess we can go >> with the simple solution for now, and defer a more complex solution >> until someone has the inclination. > > So, does this mean "please check in"? I'd like preremove scripts to be renamed on failure. But, OK, you check in as-is, and I'll follow-up with a change for that. Max. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFEGpFbfFNSmcDyxYARAkJVAJ4kDwP9yUuwcDLwwYNGiLzoXKt1EACgzJIk BjR25ByI8bMaFEEeL9yOECw= =fdn7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
