Brian Dessent wrote: > I don't like the precedent this creates -- it's bad UI. The user is > supposed to be able to get the source by just putting an X in the Src > box of the normal package. But with this scheme they can no longer do > that, they have to know to first show hidden packages and then to select > the Src column of an empty dummy package that is otherwise never > displayed, used, or needed.
Errr, nevermind. That's nonsense. Setup will follow the external-source line and do the right thing when the user selects Src of any of the packages. > Why can't you just associate the source > package with one of the two existing binary packages instead of > inventing a third, empty, hidden package to associate it with? But I still think this makes more sense. Brian
