-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Brian Dessent wrote: >> Why can't you just associate the source >> package with one of the two existing binary packages instead of >> inventing a third, empty, hidden package to associate it with? > > But I still think this makes more sense.
Because this means jumping through a lot more hoops, believe me. This method (where there's no binary package corresponding to the source package) has precedence in Debian as well. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkkPxZ8ACgkQpiWmPGlmQSPBVACdFjezrx6yxRqyEqK532Ddvun0 iTMAn1V0D7g1THH1Z9pnbfL6fopQQNPk =LMN3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
