On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:46:39PM -0600, Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote: >Brian Dessent wrote: >>> Why can't you just associate the source >>> package with one of the two existing binary packages instead of >>> inventing a third, empty, hidden package to associate it with? >> >> But I still think this makes more sense. > >Because this means jumping through a lot more hoops, believe me. This >method (where there's no binary package corresponding to the source >package) has precedence in Debian as well.
You can must make a package which contains nothing but source. You don't need a binary. cgf
