-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 According to Ralph Hempel on 1/18/2009 4:44 PM: > Charles Wilson wrote: > >> Doesn't cygwin officially support i386, or are we allowed to assume i586 >> and above, now? > > Considering that support for Win98 is going to be dropped, the > question may be answered if Win2K or better will even run on > a 386 or 486? :-)
In which case, shouldn't the gcc defaults be bumped to require this by default? - -- Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well! Eric Blake [email protected] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklzwJUACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDGtACgt6AJt6kOK9JWgW4rpcktUo5c gC8AoLo08mK5oiijjQ18fJeAqzBwX9h5 =oN8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
