On Jan 18 19:46, Charles Wilson wrote: > Ralph Hempel wrote: > > Charles Wilson wrote: > >> Doesn't cygwin officially support i386, or are we allowed to assume i586 > >> and above, now? > > > > Considering that support for Win98 is going to be dropped, the > > question may be answered if Win2K or better will even run on > > a 386 or 486? :-) > > a) cygwin-1.7 will still support NT, IIRC, so the relevant question is > what processor NT supports, not W2k. > b) we haven't dropped Win9x support YET -- that won't happen until > cygwin-1.7 is officially released. Right now it's still in...what? > public beta?
Maybe I'm too modern or something, but I think that i586 is as old as we should care these days, CPU-wise. Even if we still support NT4 and, barely, 9x. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
