Ralph Hempel wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: >> Doesn't cygwin officially support i386, or are we allowed to assume i586 >> and above, now? > > Considering that support for Win98 is going to be dropped, the > question may be answered if Win2K or better will even run on > a 386 or 486? :-)
a) cygwin-1.7 will still support NT, IIRC, so the relevant question is what processor NT supports, not W2k. b) we haven't dropped Win9x support YET -- that won't happen until cygwin-1.7 is officially released. Right now it's still in...what? public beta? -- Chuck
