On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: >Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold] >The following packages are required but have not been selected. > >Package: binutils > Required by: gcc4-g++ > >Package: gcc4-core > Required by: gcc4-g++ > >[tickbox] Install these packages to meet dependencies (RECOMMENDED) > >(That tickbox is pre-ticked. If you untick it and click Next you get >an appropriate warning about breaking your installation.) > >I think that's okay(ish), although sensitive users might read the >sentence above the list as accusing them of failing to add the >dependencies. How about "The following packages are required to >satisfy dependencies of your selection."?
That sounds ok I guess. Please check this in and I'll roll a new setup.exe release. Now we get to find the bug reports hiding behind this bug. cgf
