On 26 July 2010 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Is the above "The following packages are required to > satisfy dependencies of your selection." ok? I'm wondering if it's > a bit too wordy, but I admit I have no better way to say this.
How about this?
======
Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
The following packages are required to meet dependencies.
Package: binutils
Required by: gcc4-g++
Package: gcc4-core
Required by: gcc4-g++
[tickbox] Install required packages (RECOMMENDED)
=======
Patch attached.
* res.rc: Tweak wording on dependency resolver page.
Andy
resolver.patch
Description: Binary data
