On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: >>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold] >>The following packages are required but have not been selected. >> >>Package: binutils >> Required by: gcc4-g++ >> >>Package: gcc4-core >> Required by: gcc4-g++ >> >>[tickbox] Install these packages to meet dependencies (RECOMMENDED) >> >>(That tickbox is pre-ticked. If you untick it and click Next you get >>an appropriate warning about breaking your installation.) >> >>I think that's okay(ish), although sensitive users might read the >>sentence above the list as accusing them of failing to add the >>dependencies. How about "The following packages are required to >>satisfy dependencies of your selection."? > > That sounds ok I guess. Please check this in and I'll roll a new > setup.exe release.
I don't think I've got commit access. > Now we get to find the bug reports hiding behind this bug. :) Andy