On Aug 16 15:16, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 16 August 2011 10:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I created a new 64x64 icon with smaller C. Other than that I made > > a longish comparison of the small 16x16 and 24x24 icons on various > > backgrounds, and in contrast to what I said above, I think I prefer > > the slightly darker frames. > > Fair enough. Compared to "mine" though it looks a bit rougher around > the edges when used in a mintty window frame with dark background. In > particular, some of the corner pixels stick out and the wedge has more > pronounced stepping. (See attached pic.)
Sorry, but I really don't see that. Not in that size. Do I need specs? > I wonder whether this is due to resizing algorithm. Can you be > bothered to try different scaling algorithms, or send me the orignal > so I can have a go with Paint.net (which says it uses > "supersampling")? I don't have an original other that what Warren sent: http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/beveled-noshadow-rasterized.xcf http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/beveled-for-small-composites.xcf Everything I did with the C I did from there. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
