On 16 August 2011 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 16 15:16, Andy Koppe wrote: >> On 16 August 2011 10:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > I created a new 64x64 icon with smaller C. Other than that I made >> > a longish comparison of the small 16x16 and 24x24 icons on various >> > backgrounds, and in contrast to what I said above, I think I prefer >> > the slightly darker frames. >> >> Fair enough. Compared to "mine" though it looks a bit rougher around >> the edges when used in a mintty window frame with dark background. In >> particular, some of the corner pixels stick out and the wedge has more >> pronounced stepping. (See attached pic.) > > Sorry, but I really don't see that. Not in that size. Do I need specs?
Aliasing is in the eye of the beholder. Or something. ;) > >> I wonder whether this is due to resizing algorithm. Can you be >> bothered to try different scaling algorithms, or send me the orignal >> so I can have a go with Paint.net (which says it uses >> "supersampling")? > > I don't have an original other that what Warren sent: > > http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/beveled-noshadow-rasterized.xcf > http://etr-usa.com/cygwin/logo/beveled-for-small-composites.xcf > > Everything I did with the C I did from there. Sorry, I meant the image before scaling, but including your changes. I'm not sure I could recreate them exactly (and it would take more time). Andy
