Re: >Uhmmm....could this actually be due to the *known* memory leak in >ld.exe? (When I see 'make', I think 'compile and link' === 'gcc and ld') > If I understand you correctly -- no. I'm not using gcc or ld -- I'm using an entirely different compiler and linker whose target is an embedded non-x86 system. -------------------------- Andrew E. Kalman, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Ashok Vadekar
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman