On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:50:08PM -0700, Andrew Kalman wrote: >>The bottom line, cruel as it sounds is "I don't feel like it." This is >>not an issue for the way that Red Hat uses cygwin so it is not part of >>my official job. >etc. > >Fair enough -- there's nothing wrong with prioritizing one's work. > >Also, the same fault occurs in Win2000 -- it's not just a Win98 issue. I have never seen anything remotely like this on Windows 2000. I use it extensively. This is YA reason for someone who is having to problem to debug it. But, I understand that there is not a single solitary person in the entire cygwin mailing list community who is capable of doing that. Too bad... cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Ashok Vadekar
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman