Andrew Kalman wrote: > If I understand you correctly -- no. I'm not using gcc or ld -- I'm > using an entirely different compiler and linker whose target is an > embedded non-x86 system. Ah, okay. As I said, just a wild stab in the dark. --chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Charles Wilson
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Ashok Vadekar
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Christopher Faylor
- Re: vfork problems on Win98 -- is there a fix? Andrew Kalman