----- Original Message -----
From: "Tyler Durden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: The burn-off of Tom Veil
>
>
> >What part of my above paragraph did you not understand?
>
> The rancor part. Let's take your line of reasoning another step. Imagine
you
> get robbed at gunpoint by some masked caucasian. He steals your Ventura
> watch as well as all your $$$.
>
> As you cry and bawl like a little bitch you see the guy take off and in
the
> process toss the watch to some black dude walking up the street. Will you
> now yell: "Die you scum....you stole my watch!" (Well, YOU probably
would.)
> Why are you mad at the black dude for being tossed a freebie?
>
Thats a pretty poor analogy. Perhaps a better one is where the robber
was first *asked* to steal my watch, (as I could obviously afford another
one) and then gave it to someone else. And in fact, if this recipient kept
the watch, knowing full well that it had been taken from me by force, he has
stolen it from me. Contracting with someone else to steal from me is no
different (in fact, its possibly even worse) than stealing it from me
yourself.
-p