Jim Choate wrote: > > two different explanations. how can we find out which one is closer to > > the truth? > > What truth? in our time, if it exists, it's probably patented. > What makes you think there couldn't be even more factors like > religous, economic, or raw resource issues as well. > > Quit looking for easy answers. I wasn't. just pointing out that neither of them will be "The" answer. > > and again there's the question of whether an ideal should be followed if > > it is proven to be so volatile. > > Not sure what you mean by volatile in this context. All ideas are > volatile. I mean "turn into a tyranny at first opportunity" in this context. I would expect the "ideal state" to be a little more resistent to the stalins and hitlers of our world.
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Sunder
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... mgraffam
- Re: damn commie hypocrite... Jim Choate
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was Re: ... Jim Burnes
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! (was... Missouri FreeNet Administration
- Re: damn commie hypocrite leech! ... Tom Vogt
- Political realities (was &quo... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: Political realities (... Jim Choate
- Re: Political realities (... Tom Vogt
- Re: damn commie hypocrite lee... mgraffam
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... Tom Vogt
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... mgraffam
- Re: Re: damn commie hypoc... Tom Vogt